Impl plan section 5.1 row 1 asserts "reason = owner bridge, naming the key",
and the record could not express that: Reason::code collapses
TaintedOwnerBridge { key } to one string, so an exclusion that arrived across a
named owner key was indistinguishable from one that arrived by an incidental
link walk reaching the same verdict. Telling those apart is the entire point of
the row.
OwnerKey::code already documented itself as ending up in the phase 5 audit
output; it was simply never wired to it. Adds owner_key to AuditRow and
TaintRow, omitted when absent, and absent is meaningful: a bridge whose tainted
member shared no key directly reached the node transitively, so there is no
single key to name and naming one would be a false diagnosis.
Read-only and diagnostic-only. New test mutation-verified (stubbing the key to
None fails it); 221 tests green, clippy clean.
mollusk
d462754894