Add Ethics

This commit is contained in:
logen 2018-07-29 14:16:53 -04:00
parent 8dadc6f5d5
commit 2cc7a06916
13 changed files with 909 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 6.0.5.2 (Linux)"/>
<meta name="created" content="2018-01-05T14:03:39.991112897"/>
<meta name="changed" content="2018-01-18T12:39:43.334935624"/>
<style type="text/css">
@page { margin: 1in }
p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 120% }
</style>
</head>
<body lang="en-US" dir="ltr">
<div title="header">
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0.2in; line-height: 100%">An
Ethical Evaluation <sdfield type=PAGE subtype=RANDOM format=PAGE>0</sdfield></p>
</div>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">An
Ethical Evaluation:</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
Killers</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Joseph
J. Green</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Northern
Arizona University</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%; page-break-before: always">
<font face="Times New Roman, serif"> <i>The Killers</i><span style="font-style: normal">
is a film about a gang who is willing to lie, cheat, and steal their
way to the top. The film contains many examples of choices that many
would find to be in a positive light and just as many that could be
found in a negative light, </span><span style="font-style: normal">morally</span><span style="font-style: normal">.</span></font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><span style="font-style: normal"> The
film opens with a couple gunman entering a restaurant looking to kill
the Swede (Ole) by waiting at his regular restaurant. They decide to
hold </span><span style="font-style: normal">up </span><span style="font-style: normal">everyone
up the restaurant, while they wait for Ole, but when he doesnt
show, instead of killing all the witnesses, they decide to let them
live. A morally righteous act, to let those live whom could pose a
threat to their enterprise.</span></font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><span style="font-style: normal"> After
the </span><span style="font-style: normal">gunmen</span><span style="font-style: normal">
leave, it is revealed that Nick Adams, a patron of the restaurant who
was held up with the rest, worked with Ole </span><span style="font-style: normal">at</span><span style="font-style: normal">
a gas station. At great risk to himself, considering that Ole had
gunm</span><span style="font-style: normal">e</span><span style="font-style: normal">n
after him, he runs to his friend</span><span style="font-style: normal">s</span><span style="font-style: normal">
</span><span style="font-style: normal">home </span><span style="font-style: normal">to
warn him about the danger. What could be more morally sound than risk
your own life for a friend?</span></font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><span style="font-style: normal"> Later
in the film, there is a scene where Ole is thrashing about destroying
everything in a hotel room when a maid walks in. Ole, out of his
mind, busts open a window and prepares to jump. The maid quickly runs
to stop </span><span style="font-style: normal">him</span><span style="font-style: normal">,
in the name of God, in order to save his soul from sure destruction
</span><span style="font-style: normal">if he commits</span><span style="font-style: normal">
suicide.</span></font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"> <font face="Times New Roman, serif"> The
film also has a share of questionable at best, and condemnable at
worst, choices that its characters make. It is revealed that some of
the characters had participated in a payroll heist to steal over
$200,000 with of money. If that itself isnt enough, they even
choose to shoot a security guard who was trying to stop them as they
got away.</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> We
later find that that a woman, Kitty, only cares for herself and has
no moral character, a true classic villain. After the heist, she
decides to double cross everyone to get the money for herself. Kitty
tells Ole, who was involved with the crime, that he was being double
crossed to get him to steal all the money for himself and that she
would be with him. He does this, but, shortly after getting somewhere
safe, Kitty steals all the money and takes off to reunite with Colfax
(her current lover). Later, she also has no trouble leading the
insurance investigator (James) into a trap while she ran away though
a window in a bathroom.</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> There
are many examples of moral and not-so-moral acts scattered throughout
this film. Easily the most amoral person is Kitty. She double crosses
everyone trying to get away and live the easy life with no regard for
the lives of others. At the end of the film she even begs her dying
husband to clear her name. Some choices werent so clear, such as
shooting the security guard, considering that the guards shot first.
However they were already in the wrong, therefore, they lost the
right to defend themselves, morally or otherwise. The most morally
sound characters were likely Nick Adams and the maid who attempted to
save the life of someone who was either about to jump out a window
during a fit of rage, or had gunmen going after him. To save the life
of a friend, or to save the soul of an unknown man, what could be
more morally sound?</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
</body>
</html>

View File

@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 6.0.5.2 (Linux)"/>
<meta name="created" content="2018-01-05T13:15:57.464141209"/>
<meta name="changed" content="2018-01-05T15:20:27.399228839"/>
<style type="text/css">
@page { margin: 0.79in }
p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 120% }
</style>
</head>
<body lang="en-US" dir="ltr">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Ethics questions
As to the effect of others, guiding principles
</p>
<ol>
<li/>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Is it right
to take the life of a human, if said human is only a drain on
society? (defective people)</p>
<li/>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Is it wrong
to steal from one who is healthy, to help one who is poor? (welfare)</p>
<li/>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Is it right
to to invade privacy for the sake of safety?</p>
<li/>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Is it right
for a society to decide what an individual can put inside h{is,er}
body?`</p>
<li/>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Is it right
to sentence someone to death? What if there is indisputable
evidence?</p>
</ol>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Morals questions
As to the effect of ones self</p>
<ol>
<li/>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Is anything
right or wrong if there are none to witness it?</p>
<li/>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Is it wrong
to not be generous to the needy if I am well off? (charity)</p>
<li/>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Am I right to
slaughter this animal so that I might live?</p>
<li/>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Is it right
to kill that lives in pain because I think its the right thing to
do?</p>
<li/>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Is it right
to push my views on others because I think them to be the most just?
(LGBTQ)</p>
</ol>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">There doesnt seem
to be consensus of what morals and ethics are as separate things.
Information from single sources even tend to contradict themselves.
Therefore, Im am using “morals” to mean individual feelings
towards a thing (right or wrong), and Ethics as what ought to be done
(right or wrong).</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">The ethical
questions seem to follow how one ought to act in society.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">The moral questions
seems to follow how one feels about right and wrong</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">They seem to follow
each other. What is right and wrong for me. Tends to be right and
wrong for the whole.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Intro</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> differences</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> Morality is an
inherent feeling of right and wrong.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> Ethics is a
feeling of right and wrong in relation to society as a whole. How we
ought to act.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> Similarities</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> Both ethics and
morality are tackling similar things.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> Ethics, Is
doing this thing good for only me? Is it good for others? How does it
benefit society?</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> Morals, how do
I feel about these things?</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> Does it follow
that generally what is good for me is good for others? Do unto
others?</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Personal experience</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> What is good for
me, is good for others. Do not steal.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> Stealing
raises prices, which harms others</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> Help people when
it is reasonable to do so</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Morals and ethics
are heavily intertwined</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> Doing a thing that
feels good/right/just Morally, often times is the correct</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">way to go about
things ethically. Not always, especially for people who subscribe to
utilitarianism,</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">but it generally
seems to be a good start point. At least for an average person with
no handicap.
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
</body>
</html>

Binary file not shown.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 6.0.5.2 (Linux)"/>
<meta name="created" content="2018-01-05T14:03:39.991112897"/>
<meta name="changed" content="2018-01-29T13:45:26.604265028"/>
<style type="text/css">
@page { margin: 1in }
p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 120% }
</style>
</head>
<body lang="en-US" dir="ltr">
<div title="header">
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0.2in; line-height: 100%">Intro
To Philosophical Concepts <sdfield type=PAGE subtype=RANDOM format=PAGE>0</sdfield></p>
</div>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Intro
To Philosophical Concepts:</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">A
Test Of Words</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Joseph
J. Green</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Northern
Arizona University</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%; page-break-before: always">
<font face="Times New Roman, serif"> It has been suggested that if a
collage offered two courses, one titled “Introduction To Ethics”
and the other “Introduction To Morals”, that there would be a
completely different expectation from the course. Personally, aside
perhaps from basic classes involving rhetoric or math, few, if any,
courses were anything related to what I expected based on the course
title and descriptions. However, I still have ideas on what a class
may contain biased solely on the title, and in this case, I would
think that the morals class would be the more interesting. Granted, I
would likely question the difference between these courses with an
advisor, and indeed, likely take them both considering that
philosophy is my primary interest with college. Though, solely from
the titles alone, it would seem to me that there would be a
difference on focus between the two classes, if only because there
are two separate classes offered. Even then, it would appear that
many sources, even educational institutions, cant seem to agree
on, or if there even are any, the differences between ethics and
morals. </font>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> Morals
and ethics are both interesting, but to me, when I think of morals, I
think more about judgement about issues, and philosophical debates,
as opposed to strict standards of living, and I enjoy the concept of
an argument based solely on reason and feeling. Facts and verified
results are all well and good, but trying to focus on using reason,
and having others try to debunk that reasoning, makes for an amazing
display of our ability to think, which is vastly more interesting to
me to in day to day life. Morals also seem to imply a strong focus on
what is right and wrong for an individual to do. Is it right to kill
a man in situation A? How about in situation B? That alone can lead
to hours of enlightening discussion. Morals, by the word alone,
simply sounds like it would be more interesting than ethics. Morals
creates an image that we are going to learn about how people think
about things, ethics feels like were going to learn about some
proper way to act.</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> While
ethics is certainly fascinating, it feels more to be a set of rules
that are typically based upon, though do not necessarily follow,
morals. The focus of a class based on ethics, as opposed to morals,
would likely study philosophies on how to interact with the rest of
society. What do I do to ensure that Im doing the best thing for
my society? What actions must I take, or not take, in order to avoid
harming others? Of course, it doesnt have to be quite so
utilitarian, it could simply be trying to be a proper person in a
specific culture. Its about how we ought<i> </i><span style="font-style: normal">to
act. </span>For example, perhaps we should eat in a certain way that
is respectful to the ethical persons culture, or perhaps we avoid
saying certain things in an effort to protect others from what they
may find disagreeable. These are all interesting concepts and ideas
to study, but they also seem to stem from the basics of morals. We
dont find ourselves with proper ways to live our lives without
first examining issues on the smaller scale.</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> A
morals course, on the other hand, would focus more on the individual
and feelings. What am I doing to my neighbor? Is it okay for me to
steal from him? Is it okay to lie? Why is stealing wrong even if
people are to suffer if we do not engage in that act? Is it not
better to satisfy the hunger of ourselves or others, than to avoid
stealing from a man who eats in luxury? Should I not lie in any
circumstance? Am I more or less responsible if I lie as opposed to
telling the truth? What if it would be to save anothers
embarrassment? His life? What about my own? I would expect a morals
class to focus more on the smaller individual to individual scale,
while ethics focuses on the larger individual to societal scale.</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> </font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> Ignoring
my own feelings on the subject, it would appear that many cant
agree on the specific differences between ethics and morals in the
first place, which makes it harder to understand what the difference
between the two class titles mean to any one individual. First, lets
take a look at Princetons PHI 202: “Introduction to Moral
Philosophy”:</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-left: 0.5in; margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%">
<font face="Times New Roman, serif">An introductory survey of
ethical thought, covering such topics as the demands that morality
makes, the justification of these demands, and our reasons for
obeying them. Readings from both the historical and contemporary
philosophical literature. (“Course Descriptions”, 2018) </font>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> From
what I understand of the above description, morals are nothing more
than a component of ethical thought. Next, lets look at what Ben
Eggleston says about his “Introduction to Ethics” class with
University of Kansas: </font>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-left: 0.5in; margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%">
<font face="Times New Roman, serif">This course provides an
introduction to those problems of philosophy that are problems of
moral philosophy, or ethics. (“Introduction to Ethics (syllabus)”,
2018)</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> This
could mean one of two things. Either, morals and ethics are the same
thing, or that there is a difference between what we call moral
philosophy, which would still be the same as ethics in this case, and
what we simply refer to as morals. Now lets take a look at what
University of Massachusetts Amherst has to say about the subject in
regards to their “Introduction to Ethics” course:</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-left: 0.5in; margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%">
<font face="Times New Roman, serif">This course is an introduction to
the philosophical study of morality, including the theory of right
and wrong behavior, the theory of value (goodness and badness), and
the theory of virtue and vice. (Introduction to Ethics. [online],
2018)</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-left: 0.5in; margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%">
<br/>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> Here
we see that ethics is explicitly, “the philosophical study of
morality” (Introduction to Ethics. [online], 2018). So does this
mean that ethics is nothing more than the study of morality? That it
isnt actually something similar, yet somewhat different, from
morals, but that its just the study of morals? It would seem that
all three educational institutions see that ethics and morals very
related, perhaps without even an explicit difference. In spite of
this, it is still easy to see how a potential student would expect
something different from each class title, even if they read the
descriptions as well, given how ambiguous they are.</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> With
two courses, “Intro To Ethics” and “Intro To Morals”, I would
certainly find the latter more likely to appeal to me. I believe a
morals class would have more interesting discussion, by far, than an
ethics class. We can use reasoned arguments and point out fallacies
to help stimulate each others ability to think and understand the
world around us. The classes would likely have a difference in their
primary focus. The focus of ethics being a set of rules on how we
<i>ought</i><span style="font-style: normal"> to act, </span><span style="font-style: normal">and
that of</span><span style="font-style: normal"> morals having a
</span><span style="font-style: normal">stronger </span><span style="font-style: normal">focus
on how we feel about how we act.</span> This is, of course, only my
own interpretation of what these classes would be like. Others would
likely come to different conclusions about the contents of each
class, especially if we take into consideration that most people
either dont understand, or dont agree with, the differences and
definitions of ethics and morals; indeed, they are very similar
subjects. Even educational institutions cant seem to point out a
specific difference.</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">References</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">References</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.5in; margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%">
<font face="Times New Roman, serif">Benegg.net. (2018). Introduction
to Ethics (syllabus). [online] Available at:
http://www.benegg.net/courses/ethics9/syllabus.html [Accessed 29 Jan.
2018].</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.5in; margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%">
<br/>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.5in; margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%">
<font face="Times New Roman, serif">People.umass.edu. (2018).
Introduction to Ethics. [online] Available at:
http://people.umass.edu/~klement/160/index.html [Accessed 29 Jan.
2018].</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.5in; margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%">
<br/>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.5in; margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%">
<font face="Times New Roman, serif">Philosophy.princeton.edu. (2018).
Course Descriptions | Department of Philosophy. [online] Available
at:
https://philosophy.princeton.edu/undergraduate/course-descriptions
[Accessed 29 Jan. 2018].</font></p>
</body>
</html>

View File

@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 6.0.5.2 (Linux)"/>
<meta name="created" content="2018-01-05T14:03:39.991112897"/>
<meta name="changed" content="2018-01-12T20:18:37.473480672"/>
<style type="text/css">
@page { margin: 1in }
p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 120% }
</style>
</head>
<body lang="en-US" dir="ltr">
<div title="header">
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0.2in; line-height: 100%">Is
Heterosexual Sex Moral? <sdfield type=PAGE subtype=RANDOM format=PAGE>0</sdfield></p>
</div>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Is
Heterosexual Sex Moral?</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">An
Ethical Reflection</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Joseph
J. Green</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Northern
Arizona University</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%; page-break-before: always">
<font face="Times New Roman, serif"> There has been much debate over
the years about whether or not homosexual sex is legal, moral, or
religiously sound, but what about heterosexual sex? What is it that
makes heterosexual sex moral? What is it that makes homosexual sex
less moral? Must everything be moral or immoral, or are there
exceptions?</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> It
seems commonplace for people to believe that heterosexual sex is a
morally right thing to take part in. But what does that really mean?
John M. Finnis argues against homosexuality with some questionable
ideas, but its an enlightening way to see how some may find
heterosexual conduct moral. One such idea is that heterosexual sex
is moral because it leads to reproduction. That, of course, leads to
questions of whether reproduction itself is moral in order to
determine if the heterosexual sex is moral, or, and perhaps more
importantly, assuming that reproduction is moral, how does that
necessitate that non-reproductive sex is immoral? Does this also
mean that we are consistently being immoral when we are not engaging
in acts, sexual or otherwise, that do not lead to reproduction?</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> Since
heterosexual sex is regarded as moral already, perhaps we should
focus more on homosexuality. How can homosexual sex possibly be
moral? What <i>good</i><span style="font-style: normal"> could come
from it? Those who subscribe to a utilitarian view could see it as
increasing general happiness. If there is a </span><span style="font-style: normal">contingent</span><span style="font-style: normal">
of people wanting to engage in homosexual acts, yet morally they feel
obligated to abstain and instead have heterosexual sex that may not
actually bring happiness, does this not go against the ideal of
promoting happiness amongst people? The biggest argument against
homosexual sex, at least where John M. Finnis is concerned, is that
it is not, nor does it have certain </span><span style="font-style: normal">characteristics</span><span style="font-style: normal">
of, heterosexual sex. How can one thing be moral, and the other
immoral, based solely on the reasoning that these two things are
different?</span></font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><span style="font-style: normal"> Perhaps,
what we need to realize, is that the acts themselves are not
necessarily moral or immoral. Yes, it would be immoral to have sex
with a non-consenting partner. Equally so, it would be moral</span><span style="font-style: normal">ly
sound </span><span style="font-style: normal">to have sex with a
consenting partner. These considerations of other living beings, are
where morals exist. It doesnt matter if its two men, two
women, or even an adult and a child. So long as consent is there,
true consent, not that which is derived from coercion or other such
trickery, the act is moral. </span><span style="font-style: normal">Therefore</span><span style="font-style: normal">,
if we assign morality </span><span style="font-style: normal">to</span><span style="font-style: normal">
an act, </span><span style="font-style: normal">we</span><span style="font-style: normal">
must </span><span style="font-style: normal">view the</span><span style="font-style: normal">
considerations that lead </span><span style="font-style: normal">to</span><span style="font-style: normal">
</span><span style="font-style: normal">the specific</span><span style="font-style: normal">
act </span><span style="font-style: normal">in order to find</span><span style="font-style: normal">
our judgement. To clarify, is it okay to kill an innocent man? Is
it okay to kill a man before he can kill 30 innocent men? Many will
find one of these acts to be more or less moral than the other.</span></font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><span style="font-style: normal"> Do
we now find that heterosexual sex is moral? Did we even question it
before? How about homosexual sex? We must be able to define how
heterosexual sex is moral before we </span><span style="font-style: normal">attempt</span><span style="font-style: normal">
to declare homosexual as immoral. Furthermore, how can we claim any
act is moral or immoral without first examining the reasoning that
brought the act into existence? What morality can be derived solely
from an act itself?</span></font></p>
</body>
</html>

View File

@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 6.0.5.2 (Linux)"/>
<meta name="created" content="2018-01-05T14:03:39.991112897"/>
<meta name="changed" content="2018-01-05T16:38:45.189043819"/>
<style type="text/css">
@page { margin: 1in }
p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 120% }
</style>
</head>
<body lang="en-US" dir="ltr">
<div title="header">
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0.2in; line-height: 100%">Of
Ethics And Morality <sdfield type=PAGE subtype=RANDOM format=PAGE>0</sdfield></p>
</div>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Of
Ethics And Morality</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">A
Comparison</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Joseph
J. Green</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Northern
Arizona University</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%; page-break-before: always">
<font face="Times New Roman, serif">Of Ethics And Morality</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">A
Comparison</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> When
explaining the differences between ethics and morality, many people
dont agree and often have opposing definitions. For the purposes
of this paper, we shall define morality as an individuals inherent
feeling of right or wrong given a specific action. “Ethics” we
shall define as, how one ought to act in society. </font>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> It
is difficult to grasp the explicit difference between ethics and
morality. Definition disagreements make it harder still, but that is
a semantic argument and irrelevant to the purpose of this paper.
Suffice the say that the differences are there regardless of which
definition we associate with which word. Equally difficult is to
describe exactly how ethics and morals are similar. However, no
matter how we look at these two subjects, it is clear that they are
heavily intertwined.</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> When
we speak of morality we ask ourselves, “Is this the right thing to
do? Is it just? How would I feel if this act were committed against
me?” So we may ask, “Is it okay to steal this bread?” Most
people will answer “No, stealing is wrong,” or, “Well, it
depends.” The people saying “it depends” are thinking along the
ethical route. “My family is hungry, the only way I can conceive
to help them is to steal some bread! Is it right to do this?” This
may be the related ethical question. Many, morally, will say that it
is always wrong to steal, but some, ethically, may say that the ends
justifies the means. Morals tell us what is right and wrong on a
basic intuitive level, whereas ethics show us how we ought to act.
Morals and ethics are different, but they are also very similar.
They both deal in right and wrong, but at different levels. Is it
moral to feed a starving person? Perhaps, if we accept that charity
is virtuous. Is it right to steal in order to satisfy the moral good
of being charitable to a starving person? Perhaps, many wars were
sanctioned just for this. </font>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> Regardless,
morals and ethics are heavily intertwined, the old saying, “Whats
good for the goose is good for the gander,” fits well. If we
choose to steal from a grocery store, an act that would be
detrimental if committed against ourselves, it is not ethically sound
as it harms, not only ourselves, but others as well. Businesses lose
money and likely respond by raising prices, which lowers the value of
others money in a given society. Without going into detail, this
also suffers all the ramifications of breaching the social contract.
However, should we choose not to steal, it is morally sound, if we
consider stealing to be wrong, and it is ethically sound as it is
what we <i>ought</i> to do. While doing the right thing morally isnt
necessarily always the right thing ethically, its a great place to
start when trying to determine what is ethical.</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> Morality
and ethics are not the same thing, but they are not so different
either. It can be hard to find differences and similarities, but that
is likely due to disagreement on what those differences are. However,
within the given context above, the differences and similarities
should be clear.</font></p>
</body>
</html>

View File

@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 6.0.5.2 (Linux)"/>
<meta name="created" content="2018-01-18T09:29:27.431546392"/>
<meta name="changed" content="2018-01-18T11:51:24.289922213"/>
<style type="text/css">
@page { margin: 0.79in }
p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 120% }
</style>
</head>
<body lang="en-US" dir="ltr">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Pause at least 10
times</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">notes about various
ethical decisions made by various characters</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">sum up examples of
events that exemplify the ethical choices I would makes</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">sum up examples of
events that oppose my ethical choices</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Weigh the relative
strength of the examples, make an evaluation about the ethical
dilemmas and choices of the chars in the killers</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">08:44</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">The two gunman came
in and held up the diner place waiting for the swede to show up.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">When the swede
doesnt show up, they decide to leave everyone alive. They could
have eliminated all witnesses, but they choose to leave them alive.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">1047, Nick Adams who
was at the diner works with the swede, he decided to risk himself to
expose it to the swede before the gunman came for him</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">23:39</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Maid lady intervened
when the swede was about to jump out the window. In the name of not
going to hell, she risked herself to try to save this crazy man.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Ole Anderson is
swede name</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">“The investigator
demands more time to look at the case and gets a day”</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Sam is the name of
the ex cop</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">46:30</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"> Sam has a tip on
some stolen jewelry. Kitty happened to be wearing it and decided to
take her in. Ole shows up and takes the fall for the stolen jewelry,
punches his friend, and runs off. He was caught the next day.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Sam had to make the
choice of whether to take him in, or walk away.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">46:59</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Sam (ex-copper)
decides to host the burial for Ole</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">56ish
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Charleston told his
friend the Swede to not worry about the girl.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">The swede had to
make the choice to get in on the crime, hoping to win the girl</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">59ish</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">One of the robbers
shoots a security guy in the groin</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">1h 4m</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Swede steps in to
object about Kitty being struck</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">1h 16</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Insurance
investigator does a setup to try to capture blinky and interrigate
him at gunpoint</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">1h 18</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">dum dum lets the
investigator live</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">investigator
James Riordan</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">1h 24ish</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Riordan lies to
Kitty, telling her he was sending someone to meet her, when in
reality it was him.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">1h 31m</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Kitty admits to
using the swede in order to make a big cut to get out of the crime
life</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">1h 32m</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">kitties sets up the
swede. Telling him that the others are double crossing him and set
the whole thing up. Say that they planned to cut him out by not
going to the halfway house.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><br/>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">1h 36m</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%">Kitty ditches the
investigator to let him get killed while she fled.</p>
</body>
</html>

Binary file not shown.

View File

@ -153,6 +153,30 @@ High Noon On The Waterfront And The_Red_Scare [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.c
<BR> <BR>
</P> </P>
<h3>Ethics</h3>
<P>
An Ethical Evaluation: The Killers [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.com/school_essays/essays/An_Ethical_Evaluation:_The_Killers.html">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.com/school_essays/essays/An_Ethical_Evaluation:_The_Killers.odt">ODT</a>]
<BR>
Intro To Philosophical Concepts: A Test Of Words [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.com/school_essays/essays/Intro_To_Philosophical_Concepts:_A_Test_Of_Words.html">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.com/school_essays/essays/Intro_To_Philosophical_Concepts:_A_Test_Of_Words.odt">ODT</a>]
<BR>
Ethic Moral Questions [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.com/school_essays/essays/Ethic_moral_questions.html">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.com/school_essays/essays/Ethic_moral_questions.odt">ODT</a>]
<BR>
Of Ethics And Morality A Comparison [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.com/school_essays/essays/Of_Ethics_And_Morality_A_Comparison.html">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.com/school_essays/essays/Of_Ethics_And_Morality_A_Comparison.odt">ODT</a>]
<BR>
The Killers Notes [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.com/school_essays/essays/the_killers_notes.html">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.com/school_essays/essays/the_killers_notes.odt">ODT</a>]
<BR>
Is Heterosexual Sex Moral An Ethical Reflection [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.com/school_essays/essays/Is_Heterosexual_Sex_Moral_An_Ethical_Reflection.html">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://criticalsarcasm.com/school_essays/essays/Is_Heterosexual_Sex_Moral_An_Ethical_Reflection.odt">ODT</a>]
<BR>
</P>
</body> </body>
</html> </html>