criticalsarcasm/school_essays/essays/Technobabble_and_Civilization_Postman_and_Freud.html

222 lines
13 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

2018-07-28 17:11:07 -04:00
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 6.0.5.2 (Linux)"/>
<meta name="created" content="2018-01-05T14:03:39.991112897"/>
<meta name="changed" content="2018-05-25T17:47:52.105174363"/>
<style type="text/css">
@page { margin: 1in }
p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 120% }
a:link { so-language: zxx }
</style>
</head>
<body lang="en-US" dir="ltr">
<div title="header">
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0.2in; line-height: 100%">POSTMAN
FREUD <sdfield type=PAGE subtype=RANDOM format=PAGE>0</sdfield></p>
</div>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Technobabble
and Civilization</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Postman
and Freud</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Joseph
J. Green</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Northern
Arizona University</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%; page-break-before: always">
<font face="Times New Roman, serif"> Sigmund Freud and Neil Postman
have many theories relating to civilization and technology. In Neil
Postmans “The Judgement of Thamus in his book Technopoly: The
Surrender of Culture to Technology has quite a bit to say on the
relationship between civilization and technology. Sigmund Freud in
his book Civilization and Its Discontents, discusses much about the
growth of civilization and also touches on how technology has an
effect on civilization.</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> In
“The Judgement of Thamus,” Postman touches on the idea that
technology is neither good nor bad for society, but that it is both
good and bad. It adds as well as detracts from culture. This chapter
opens with him discussing the story of the king Thamus talking to the
god Theuth, an inventor. Theuth had creating writing and he was happy
to expose how amazing the technology is and how much it will benefit
man kind. Theuth spoke of the wonders of storing and sharing wisdom
and memory through this invention. Thamus countered him by stating
that an inventor doesnt know that his technology is good or bad,
that an inventor is inherently biased towards his invention. Thamus
specifically discredited the idea of writing by stating that he
believed that this invention of writing will encourage people to stop
practicing memory and become more forgetful, and that it will cause
people to depend on external things as a device to aid in
recollection. He further complains that writing will help wisdom and
memory spread, which isnt inherently bad, but by doing so, people
who do not fully understand the wisdom of the words without proper
instruction, they will be “filled with the conceit of wisdom
instead of real wisdom” (Postman, 1993). As we know, writing has
opened up an incredible amount of opportunity for humanity, but it is
also clear that we have lost some things, such as memory, but the
gains have been immense. Postman also claims that technology really
needs to be looked at from both sides. He even admits that he often
looks for the dissenting opinion when looking at new technologies,
but feels that it is important to show reasonable counter to
optimism. Furthermore, he finds that technologies are often adopted
without much realization and results in new technologies, the
winners, beckoning people of old technology, the losers, to join in
with them. Espousing all the benefits of the new versus the old.</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> In
Civilization and its Discontents Freud tries to explain some of the
actions of why people do what they do, how people have come to how
they are, and, especially, how to obtain the happiness that people
seek. Throughout this work Freud makes many claims. He finds that
people evolve much like cities. Over the course of time, cities are
demolished, burned down, or simply destroyed and rebuilt slowly over
time during peace. He specifically mentions how ancient cities that
still exist are largely built upon ruins of itself. Some of these
things go away completely, but most stay either hidden or adapted
into the works and buildings that go on in the city. These things
become something new, yet maintain something old. He says this in
human memories and physiology. He explains how puberty results in the
loss of the thymus gland and that it is replaced by connective
tissue, and how an adults completed bone contains the child hood bone
that had been there before it, and how new experiences and,
specifically, memories of experiences merge and form new thoughts
that bring people to who they are at the present. Much like cities.
Freud also found that, however civilization is defined, protections
are sought from dangers that come from the suffering that comes from
its own civilization. This seems particularly interesting given the
fact that we know it is true, at least at a basic level. For example,
civilization started herding animals that lead to the creation of,
and increased spread of, new diseases which we then needed to protect
ourselves against (&quot;Humans Change the World&quot;, 2016). Freud
also, like Postman, found that technology doesnt so much bring
happiness as it brings change to humanity where good and bad both
take place, not simply one or the other. Specifically, Freud mentions
how if certain technology didnt get created, other technology
wouldnt be needed to maintain happiness. If the locomotive never
carried people across continents, people would likely have stayed
closer to home more often which would remove the need for long
distance communication in order to solve the anxiety about distant
friends and family. One thing Freud seemed especially insistent about
is that technology brings people closer to godlihood. To make a
primal example, the discovery and control of fire brought <font face="Times New Roman, serif">the
human race from being weak creatures struggling to survive, to a
species with the ability to see the world burn. </font><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Freud
also found beauty to be fascinating because of how utterly useless it
is. It does not assist in survival in any obvious way, so our desire
for beauty is a bit of a mystery. He also claims that cleanliness is
also not found in nature, yet humans seem to have a passion for that,
but he did find that order is certainly a part of nature. He finds
order to be incredibly useful for everything that humans do, yet
paradoxically, its one of the hardest things to teach people to
pay attention to due to their natural carelessness.</font></font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> These
two writers are certainly very opinionated and clearly have thought
about the issues at hand that they discuss. Both Freud and Postman
seem to agree that technology isnt a “good or bad” issue, but
a “good and bad” issue. This, to me, is clearly obvious. We see
it today with the introduction of the Internet. Im one of those
strange kids who was born in the mid 80s. Born just early enough
to grow up during the transition of the world to the Internet and for
computers to go from things only hobbyists and businessmen used, to
every family having a computer, and finally to every person having an
overpriced super restricted computer they carelessly put in their
pockets. I was particularly interested in computers from a young age,
so I was able to see the transition of society from the eyes of a
person who understood what was actually going on. This alone could be
a paper of its own, but to keep my example brief I will restrict it
to one thing that the Internet has done. It has given us access to a
huge database of jobs where we can find anything we want, anywhere in
the world, and, if we desire and have the ability, take that job and
move to wherever it is. Wonderful, but a huge drawback is the
increased competition. A company may have settled for a local worker
looking to get his start back in the early 90s, but now many
companies are hoping for talent from anywhere in the country can come
serve them which makes it much harder for people without much
experience to gain it when competition is so steep. Im also fully
in agreement with much of what Postman has said about technology
sneaking in, taking over, and changing who the winners and losers
are. I dont believe anyone could have expected the computers or
the Internet to change the world in the profound ways that it has.
Heck, Marion Zimmer Bradley in his book, The Colors of Space,
predicted a futuristic world run by advanced civilizations who fly
around in spaceships, but still use books to navigate space along
side computer that take punchcards and spit out information on paper
(Bradley et al., 2007). At the time the novel was written, this was
the current state of computers, considering other technologies that
existed at the time, Im surprised the author didnt think of
something considering other technologies that existed at the time,
such as televisions, but it goes to show that it is incredibly hard
to foresee the future and the effects technology will have on it.
Now, I must disagree with Freud's insistence that beauty is useless.
If we think of its direct practical non-emotional value, it does seem
rather useless. However, when we consider that humans are creative
artful creatures, and that beauty inspires us, it seems to have a
very practical value. Humans see beauty which inspires them for
everything from creating great thing, to reproduction. Even some
animals flaunt pretty colors in an effort to attract mates.</font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"> Freud
and Postman certainly have many great, well thought out, theories.
Postman fantastically lays out some of the effects of technology and
civilization and poses the warning that we must look at things from
more than one side. Freud seems to share some thoughts with Postman,
but also finds a lot more specific to humans and civilization than
such focus on technology. Both of these men have many theories that
are both agreeable and disagreeable to myself, but to go through
every theory we could write a book. In any case, many great ideas
emanate from great people and we should consider them all to the best
of our ability.</font></p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%; page-break-before: always">
<br/>
</p>
<p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">RESOURCES</font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.2in; text-indent: -0.2in; margin-bottom: 0.08in; font-variant: normal; letter-spacing: normal; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman">Bradley, M.,
Simão, A., Smallheer, J., Nelson, M., Savage, K., &amp; Rose, L.
(2007).&nbsp;<i>The Colors of Space</i>&nbsp;[Audio Book]. Retrieved
from
https://librivox.org/the-colors-of-space-by-marion-zimmer-bradley/</font></font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.2in; text-indent: -0.2in; margin-bottom: 0.08in; font-variant: normal; letter-spacing: normal; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman">Freud, S.
(1930).&nbsp;<i>Civilization and Its Discontents</i>&nbsp;(pp. 1-99).</font></font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.2in; text-indent: -0.2in; margin-bottom: 0.08in; font-variant: normal; letter-spacing: normal; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman">Humans Change the
World. (2016). Retrieved from
http://humanorigins.si.edu/human-characteristics/humans-change-world</font></font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.2in; text-indent: -0.2in; margin-bottom: 0.08in; font-variant: normal; letter-spacing: normal; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman">Postman, N.
(1993).&nbsp;<i>Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to
Technology</i>&nbsp;(1st ed., pp. 1-17). New York: Knopf.</font></font></p>
<p align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%"><br/>
</p>
</body>
</html>